TaxIntellilytics Stories

The Casebook · The tally sticks

The tally sticks

Every case in the Casebook, counted: 47 decided disputes from the Tax Appeals Tribunal and the courts, by what they were about, who won, how long they took and how much was at stake.

Derived
decided disputes in the book
47
decided disputes in the book
in this selection went for the taxpayer; not a win rate
18 of 47
in this selection went for the taxpayer; not a win rate
in this selection upheld the liability, in full or to recompute
25 of 47
in this selection upheld the liability, in full or to recompute
median, from the disputed period to the decision
7 years
median, from the disputed period to the decision

The oldest tax record there is

For about seven centuries England's Exchequer recorded tax on split sticks: a bigger sum cut a wider notch, and each side kept a half, so neither could cheat. The practice ended in 1826. In 1834 the old sticks were burned in the furnaces of Parliament, and the fire destroyed most of the building. So here is the count, cut the same way.

A medieval English split tally stick, front and reverse, with notches cut along one edge.
A real one: a medieval English split tally, front and reverse. Photograph: Winchester City Council Museums, posted by Hampshire Museums, via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 2.0. Shown unaltered.
Cut a stick for each

A wider, deeper notch is a bigger sum (log scale) One thin cut: no sum reportedTTaxpayerUURAPSplitSSent back

A ruling is notched on every stick it belongs to, so the sticks add up to more than 47. This is a selected collection, and a tally of it is not a win rate. The sticks are drawn; the photograph above is a real one.

How long it took

Years from the first disputed year to the ruling, one square a ruling, for the 39 where both dates are known. This is not how long the dispute itself ran: it measures from the tax year, and the dispute starts later.
The same count as tables

By what the dispute was about

Cases by what the dispute was about
CategoryCases, by who they went forFor the taxpayerMedian yearsAt stake
Cross-border and related partiesTransfer pricing, imported services, withholding on non-residents
13
2 of 138 (12)UGX 89.4bn (10)
Deadlines and procedureObjection and appeal windows, ADR, time limits on assessment
10
3 of 107 (6)UGX 42.6bn (9)
Evidence, estimates and reconciliationsAssessments built on variances, estimates or missing records
9
4 of 98 (8)UGX 14.4bn (7)
Exemptions, remissions and zero-ratingWhether a relief applies, and to which part
9
5 of 98 (9)UGX 54.2bn (8)
What kind of income or supplyRent or business income, payment or not, benefit or not
7
2 of 76 (7)UGX 31.7bn (7)
Collection and enforcementAgency notices, sealing, distress, recovery from related companies
7
3 of 76.5 (4)UGX 59.8bn (6)
Deductions, losses and interestWhat can be deducted, capped or carried forward
6
1 of 66 (6)UGX 11.1bn (5)
The Revenue Authority's past positionsWhether earlier advice or practice binds it (legitimate expectation)
5
3 of 510 (4)UGX 5.3bn (4)
Customs classificationWhich tariff heading, and so which duty rate
4
2 of 48 (3)UGX 5.7bn (4)
The 30% deposit and the route of appealPaying to be heard, and which court hears what
3
2 of 33 (2)UGX 33.7bn (1)
Informer rewardsWho gets paid, and at which rate
2
1 of 210 (1)UGX 4.2bn (2)
These counts describe a selected collection, 30 of them from the Revenue Authority's own digest: they are not win rates. A case counts under every category it belongs to. Median years: from the first year of the disputed period to the decision, over the cases where both are known (their number in brackets). At stake: the UGX amounts reported (number of cases in brackets); amounts in other currencies or not reported are left out.

By tax

Cases by tax head
CategoryCases, by who they went forFor the taxpayerMedian yearsAt stake
Income tax
19
6 of 196 (16)UGX 31.9bn (15)
VAT
15
8 of 158 (12)UGX 90.4bn (14)
Customs
7
3 of 710 (6)UGX 6.3bn (6)
Procedure
5
3 of 53 (2)UGX 55.5bn (3)
Withholding tax
3
0 of 310 (3)UGX 26.2bn (3)
Excise
2
0 of 23.5 (2)UGX 18.5bn (1)
Informer reward
2
1 of 210 (1)UGX 4.2bn (2)
PAYE
1
0 of 17 (1)UGX 1.8bn (1)
Stamp duty
1
0 of 111 (1)UGX 0.1bn (1)
These counts describe a selected collection, 30 of them from the Revenue Authority's own digest: they are not win rates. A case counts under every category it belongs to. Median years: from the first year of the disputed period to the decision, over the cases where both are known (their number in brackets). At stake: the UGX amounts reported (number of cases in brackets); amounts in other currencies or not reported are left out.
Interpretation
  • Most cases in the book are about cross-border and related parties: 13 of 47.
  • Among categories with five or more cases in this selection, the largest share went for the taxpayer on the Revenue Authority's past positions (3 of 5) and the smallest on cross-border and related parties (2 of 13).
  • Cases about the Revenue Authority's past positions took longest: a median of 10 years from the disputed period to the decision.

These are patterns in this collection, not in all disputes; see the limits below.

The caseload behind the cases

Observed
  • Cases pending at the Tribunal rose from 169 in 2022/23 to 476 in 2024/25, with about UGX 1.5 trillion tied up in tax disputes and an average of about ten months to resolve a case, according to the Auditor General's 2025 report and the Tribunal's chair, as reported by Sanyu FM (17 February 2026).
  • The Revenue Authority historically wins about 93% of its Tribunal disputes, according to the Daily Monitor (2 September 2026).

What this map can and cannot tell you

  • It counts the 47 cases in this book, not every dispute. Thirty come from the Revenue Authority's own Case Digest, which covers one half-year; the rest were reported by advisers or the press, who write up the unusual and the large. Taxpayers win more often here (38%) than the Authority's reported overall record would suggest, which is what that selection would produce.
  • Categories are our classification of each case, and many cases belong to more than one.
  • Time is measured from the first year of the disputed period, not from the assessment, so it includes the years before the audit; where that year is not reported the case is left out.
  • Amounts are as reported and are not adjusted for inflation; some are the assessment, some the sum finally in dispute.

Sources for the sticks: Wikipedia, Tally stick; Science Museum Group, Exchequer tallies. Every case behind these numbers: the cause list. What they suggest should change: the brief.

Sources: the cases in the Casebook (47); Sanyu FM, ‘UGX 1.5 trillion locked in tax appeals’, 17 February 2026; Daily Monitor, ‘URA loses over Shs1 billion in Medisell tax dispute’, 2 September 2026.